Opinion

Brown v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders International Union Local 54

78 L. Ed. 2d 677 · Supreme Court of the United States · Nov 28, 1983

Full text

Brown, Director, Department of Law and Public Safety, Division of Gaming Enforcement, State of New Jersey v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders International Union Local 54 and Danziger, Acting Chairman, Casino Control Commission of New Jersey v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders International Union Local 54

Appeals from C. A. 3d Cir. Probable jurisdiction noted, cases consolidated, and a total of one hour allotted for oral argument. Reported below: 709 F. 2d 815.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 9287121

Citations

78 L. Ed. 2d 677
464 U.S. 990
104 S. Ct. 479
52 U.S.L.W. 3422
1983 U.S. LEXIS 2450

Cited by

Estate of William A. Lidbury, Deceased, Harry Lidbury, Petitioner- Cross-Appellant v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Cross-Appellee
Seventh Circuit · Sep 3, 1986
Schwartz v. Judicial Retirement System of NJ
D. New Jersey · Apr 12, 1984

Parentheticals

"[N]o [ Burford ] argument can be entertained based on disruption of a state administrative scheme in a case in which the court is asked to decide whether the very existence of that scheme violates a paramount federal statute"
Schwartz v. Judicial Retirement System of NJ
“[N]o [Burford ] argument can be entertained based on disruption of a state administrative scheme in a case in which the court is asked to decide whether the very existence of that scheme violates a paramount federal statute”
Schwartz v. Judicial Retirement System of NJ