Wingard v. United States

Mr. Justice Harlan delivered the opinion of the court. Substantially the same questions are presented in this case that have been determined in McAllister v. United States, ante, 174, just decided. Upon the authority of that case, and for the Reasons stated in the opinion, the judgment is Affirmed. Mi*. Justice Field, wither it??- anovyredA. ° jsjtce Gray. and Mr. Justice Brown, dissenting. *203 ■ I dissent from, the judgment of the court in this case, on the grounds stated in my dissenting opinion in McAllister v. United States. I may also add to those grounds the fact that, by the laws of-the United States applicable to all the Territories, it is provided that for each Territory there shall be appointed a Governor, a Secretary, a Chief Justice and two Associate Justices of its Supreme Court, an Attorney and a Marshal, and that their terms shall be four years and. until their successors are appointed and qualified, with this difference: that it is declared with reference to all the officers, except the Justices of the Supreme Court, that they shall hold their offices for that term, unless sooner removed by the President; but that qualification is not added to the term of the Justices. (Eev. Stat. §§ 1841, 1843, 1864, 1875, 1876, 1877.) It is also to be observed that the acts of Congress organizing the different Territories of the United States, and providing for judicial tribunals therein, from the foundation of the government down to the present time, with, three exceptions, have fixed the term of the judicial officers of the Territories at definite periods absolutely, without any conditions, or simply with the condition “ upon good behavior.” ■ In two of these exceptions where the words “unless sooner removed” are added, the power of removal is not vested in the President, but left to be exercised under the general law of the country applicable to such officers; that is, by impeachment or by the joint action of th$ President and Congress, after full opportunity is given to the accused of being heard upon the grounds of complaint. In the third exception the words addedv arp: “ unless sooner removed ,by the President with the consent of the Senate of the United States,” which implies a previous consideration * by the Senate of th e grounds of removal, and this would usually be accompanied with notice to the accused and an opportunity afforded to him'of being heard thereon. 1 . *204 From this statement it is apparent that the general legislation of Congress has been against making the tenure of thé *205 judicial office in courts of record of the Territories subject to the will of the President. The last exception is the only one in which any authority in that respect could be exercised by him, and that is to be with the conjoint action of the Senate. I am authorized to say that Justices Gray and Brown agrée with me in this dissent. Footnotes [1] The following list exhibits the terms of the judges and the organic acts for all, the Territories: • Northwest of Ohio: “ During good behavior.” Ordinance.of 1787; 1 Stat. 51, note; Rev. Stat. 2d ed. 13. *204 Mississippi: “ During good behavior.” Act 7 April, 1798. Sec. 3, 1 Stat. 550. Act 27 March, 1804. Sec. 2, 2 Stat. 301. Act 2 March, 1810. Sec. 2, 2 Stat. 564. South of Ohio: “ During good behavior.” Act 26 May, 1790. Sec. 1, 1 Stat. 123. Indiana: “ During good behavior.” Act 7 May, 1800. Sec. 3, 2 Stat. 59. Orleans: “Fouryears,” absolute. Act 26 March, 1804. Sec. 5, 2 Stat. 284. Louisiana (District) : “ During good b,ehavior.” Act 26 March, 1804. Sec. 12, 2 Stat. 287. ■ Michigan: “ During good behavior.” '' Act 11 January, 1805. Sec. 3, 2 Stat. 309. Act 30 January, 1823. Sec 1, 3 Stat. 722. Illinois: “ During good behavior.” Act 3 February, 1809. Sec. 3, 2 Stat. 515. Missouri: Four years, unless sooner removed.” ■ Act 4 June, 1812. Sec. 10, 2 Stat. 746. Act 27 January, 1814. Sec. 1, 3 Stat. 95.' . Alabama:“ During good behavior.” ■ Act 3 March, 1817. Secs. 2. and 3, 3 Stat. 372. Arkansas : “ Four years, unless sooner removed.” Act 2 March, 1819. .Sec. 7, 3 Stat. 495. Florida: ’(Judges not appointed by-the President.) Act 30 March, 1822. -Sec. 6, 3 Stat..656. Act 26. May, 1824. Sec. 1, 4 Stat. 45. Act 21 January, 1829. Sec. 4, 4 Stat. 333. Wisconsin:“ During good behavior.” Act 20 April, 1836. Sec. .9, 6 Stat. 13. •Iowa: “ Four years,” absolute. Act 12 June, 1838. Sec. 9, 5 §tat. 237-38. ■Oregon: “ Four years,” absolute. •Act 14 August, 1848. Sec 9, 9 Stat. 326. Minnesota: “ Four years,” absolute. Act 3 March,. 1849. Sec. 9, 9 Stat. 406. . Utah: “ Four years,” absolute. Act 9 September, 1850. Sec. 9, 9 Stat. 455. Act 25 June, 1888. Sec. 2, 25 Stat. 204. Flew Mexico: “ Four years,” absolute. , Act 9 September, 1850. Sec. 10, 9 Stat. 449. ' Washington: “ Four years,” absolute. Act-2 March, 1853. Sec.-9, 10 Stat. 175. Act 4 July, 1884. Sec. 10, 23 Stat. 102. *205 Nebraska: “Four years,” absolute. Act 30 May, 1854. Sec. 9, Í0 Stat. 280. Kansas: “ Four years,” absolute. Act 30 May, 1854. Sec. 27, 10 Stat. 286. Colorado: “ Four years,” absolute. Act 28 February, 1861. Sec.'9, 12 Stat. 174. •Act 2 March, 1863. Sec. 3, 12 Stat. 700. Nevada: “Four years,” absolute. Act 2 March, 1861. Sec. 9, 12 Stat. 212. Dakota: “ Four years,” absolute.. Act 2 March, 1861. Sec. 9, 12 Stat. 241. Act 4 July, 1884. Sec. 2, 23 Stat. 101. Act 9 August, 1888. Sec. 2, 25 Stat. 398. Arizona: “ Four years,” absolute. Act 24 February, 1863. Sec. 2, 12 Stat. 665. Idaho: “ Four years,’’ absolute. Act 3 March, 1863. Sec. 9,12 Stat. 811. Montana: “ Four years,” absolute. Act 26 May, 1864. Sec. 9, 13 Stat. 88. Act 10 July, 1886.' Sec. 1, 24 Stat. 138. Wyoming: “ Four years,” “ unless sooner removed by the President with he consent of the Senate of the United States.” Act 25 July, 1868. Sec. 9, 15 Stat. 178. Alaska: “ Four years,” absolute. Act of May 17, 1884. 23 Stat. 24. Oklahoma: “ Four years,” absolute. Act of May 2, 1890. 26 Stat. 81.