Bernacco v. United States

PER CURIAM. [1] This is a “motion for supersedeas” by plaintiffs in error, who stand convicted and sentenced to fine and to imprisonment. A supersedeas of the judgment of conviction “simply prevents the execution of the judgment of the trial court, and by no means involves tire question as to whether pending the writ of error he shall be detained or go at large upon bail.” McKnight v. United States, 113 Fed. 451, 452, 51 C. C. A. 285, 286. The important thing sought here is allowance of bail. The supersedeas of the judgment may be allowed. The allowance of bail will be considered more at length. Writ of error to this court has been perfected and the transcript filed herein without delay. Application for bail was denied by the trial court. The position of plaintiffs in error is (a) that a writ of error in a crim- 1 inal case operates as or entitles the plaintiff in error to release upon proper bail bond as a matter of right; (b) that, if the granting of such bail release is discretionary with the court, such discretion requires that it be granted in this instance. [2] (a) The court is clear that the allowance to bail after conviction is not an absolute right, but entirely within the exercise of a sound judicial discretion. This was true at common law. 6 C. J. 954; 3 R. C. L. 5. This is the rule in federal courts. Garvey v. United States (C. C. A.) 292 Fed. 591; United States v. St. John, 254 Fed. 794, 166 C. C. A. 240; Ex parte Harlan (C. C.) 180 Fed. 119, 135 ; United States v. Simmons, 47 Fed. 723, 14 L. R. A. 78. Also see Ex parte Green (D. C.) 165 Fed. 557; McKnight v. United States, 113 Fed. 451, 51 C. C. A. 285; United States v. Devlin, Fed. Cas. No. 14.955; Lee’s Case, Fed. Cas. No. 8,180. McCourt v. Singers-Bigger, 150 Fed. 102, 80 C. C. A. 56 (this court), is not pertinent, as it was a civil appeal. Hudson v. Parker, 156 U. S. 277, 15 Sup. Ct. 450, 39 L. Ed. 424, is not in any way opposed either as to decision (which was upon other matters) or as to expressions in the opinion. Rule 35, par. 2, of this court is that the Circuit Justice, a Circuit Judge, or the District Court “shall have power” to admit to bail after perfection of writ of error — not must so admit to bail. (b) The court has very carefully examined this entire record and the circumstances and facts pertinent to the allowance of bail. It is of the opinion that the exercise of a sound judicial discretion requires .denial of the bail sought. Supersedeas of the judgment will be allowed and the application for bail denied. Footnotes [1] (g=»b’or other cases see same topic & KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests & Indexes