Opinion

Ctr. for Med. Progress v. Planned Parenthood Fed'n of Am.

139 S. Ct. 1446 · Supreme Court of the United States · Apr 1, 2019

Full text

CENTER FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS v. PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Citations

Cited by

Parentheticals

“[W]hen an anti-SLAPP motion to 9 strike challenges only the legal sufficiency of a claim, a district court should apply the Federal 10 Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) standard and consider whether a claim is properly stated.”
Smith v. Craig
“[W]hen 21 an anti-SLAPP motion to strike challenges only the legal sufficiency of a claim, a district court 22 should apply the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) standard and consider whether a 23 claim is properly stated.”
Whittemore v. Anderson Financial Services, LLC