Full text
Calton v. Harris
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
____________________________________ )
ALLEN F. CALTON, )
) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 23-01399 (ABJ) )
SCOTT S. HARRIS, )
) Respondent. ) ____________________________________)
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Petitioner Allen F. Calton is a Texas state prisoner appearing pro se. He seeks a writ of
mandamus against the Clerk of the U.S. Supreme Court, who allegedly has refused to file
petitioner’s “original jurisdiction habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 to Justice Alito” and to
accept his $300.00 filing fee. Pet., ECF No. 1 at 3. As petitioner admits, “the clerk has made clear
that [the] papers” were rejected because “the Supreme Court rules make no provision for the filing
of a petition for an extraordinary writ addressed to an individual Justice.” Id. at 4 , citing Ex. A.
Regardless of the reason, “supervisory responsibility” over the Clerk “is exclusive to the
Supreme Court” and “neither a district court nor a circuit court of appeals has jurisdiction to
interfere with it by mandamus or otherwise.” In re Marin, 956 F.2d 339, 340 (D.C. Cir. 1992) (per
curiam). So, this case will be dismissed by separate order for want of jurisdiction. See id.
(affirming “the district court’s order dismissing Marin’s complaint for lack of subject matter
jurisdiction”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 (h)(3) (requiring dismissal of the action “at any time” the court
determines that it lacks subject-matter jurisdiction).
AMY BERMAN JACKSON
DATE: May 23, 2023 United States District Judge
