Opinion

Sipperley v. Smith

155 U.S. 86 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 29, 1894

Full text

Sipperley v. Smith

The Chief Justice : The motion to dismiss is sustained upon the authority of Masterson v. Herndon, 10 Wall. 416; Hardee v. Wilson, 146 U. S. 179 ; Inglehart v. Stansbury, 151 U. S. 68; Davis v. Mercantile Trust Co., 152 U. S. 590. Appeal dismissed.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: The Chief Justice:
Cluster ID: 94016

Citations

155 U.S. 86
15 S. Ct. 15
39 L. Ed. 79
1894 U.S. LEXIS 2251

Cited by

Tayton Seth Finley v. the State of Texas
Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth) · Sep 22, 2022
Iowa Southern Utilities Company v. The United States
Court of Claims · Jul 16, 1965
Bankers' Trust Co. v. Peoria Ry. Terminal Co.
Seventh Circuit · Feb 27, 1931
Parker v. New England Oil Corp.
D. Massachusetts · Oct 22, 1926
Newton v. Consolidated Gas Co. of NY
Supreme Court · May 12, 1924
Newton v. Consolidated Gas Co.
Supreme Court · Mar 10, 1924
Continental & Commercial Trust & Savings Bank v. Corey Bros. Const. Co.
Ninth Circuit · May 19, 1913
Provident Life & Trust Co. of Philadelphia v. Camden & T. Ry. Co.