Sellars v. Redondo

270 A.D.2d 407 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 20, 2000

Full text

Catherine Sellars v. Alvaro Redondo

Opinions in this case

Majority
Majority

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Shaw, J.), dated March 20, 1998, as denied his cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs. The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see, Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (see, CPLR 5501 [a] [1]; Sellars v Redondo, 270 AD2d 407 [decided herewith]). Bracken, J. P., Krausman, McGinity and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 9462496

Citations

270 A.D.2d 407
704 N.Y.S.2d 881
704 N.Y.S.2d 643

Cited by

Rubina v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · May 13, 2008
Weintraub v. Levine

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Oct 17, 2005

Wiwigac v. Snedaker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Apr 5, 2001

Trane Co. v. 401 Broad Hollow Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · May 30, 2000

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.