Full text
Jeremy Pinson v. Barbara Von Blanckensee
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 25 2024 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON, No. 22-16668
Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:19-cv-00421-RM
v. MEMORANDUM* BARBARA VON BLANCKENSEE,
Respondent-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Rosemary Márquez, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 19, 2024** San Francisco, California
Before: FRIEDLAND, SANCHEZ, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Federal prisoner Jeremy Vaughn Pinson appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying her 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the denial of a § 2241 petition. Lane v. Swain, 910 F.3d 1293, 1295 (9th Cir. 2018). We affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
As the district court held, the record demonstrates that Pinson did not properly exhaust her administrative remedies before filing her § 2241 petition. See 28 C.F.R. § 542.15; Martinez v. Roberts, 804 F.2d 570, 571 (9th Cir. 1986). Pinson does not dispute that she failed to submit a BP-11 form and alleges no facts indicating that prison officials prevented her from submitting one.