Ulma Milagro Serrano v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

Case 2:22-cv-02535-FMO-AS Document 25 Filed 11/28/22 Page 1 of 1 Page ID #:149 JS-6 — 1 — — 2 — — 3 — — 4 — — 5 — — 6 — 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA — 9 — 10 ULMA MILAGRO SERRANO, ) Case No. CV 22-2535 FMO (ASx) ) 11 Plaintiff, ) ) 12 v. ) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT ) PREJUDICE 13 COSTCO WHOLESALE ) CORPORATION et al, ) 14 ) Defendant. ) 15 ) — 16 — Having been advised by counsel that the above-entitled action has been settled, (Dkt. 24, — 17 — Notice of Settlement), IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed — 18 — without costs and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown by no later than — 19 — December 28, 2022, to re-open the action if settlement is not consummated. The court retains — 20 — full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. Failure — 21 — to re-open or seek an extension of time to re-open the action by the deadline set forth above shall — 22 — be deemed as consent by the parties to dismissal of the action with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. 23 P. 41 (b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30 , 82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388 (1962). — 24 — Dated this 28th day of November, 2022. — 25 — /s/ 26 Fernando M. Olguin United States District Judge — 27 — — 28 —