Gaskins v. Johnson & Johnson

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL FILED on Jan 22, 2020 MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN RE: JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2738 (SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE) CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —193) On October 4, 2016, the Panel transferred 10 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407 . See 220 F.Supp.3d 1356 (J.P.M.L. 2016). Since that time, 1,843 additional action(s) have been transferred to the District of New Jersey. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Freda L. Wolfson. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the District of New Jersey and assigned to Judge Wolfson. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the District of New Jersey for the reasons stated in the order of October 4, 2016, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Freda L. Wolfson. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel. Inasmuch as no objection is pending at this time, the ee FOR THE PANEL: | Jan 21, 2020 | aera _ Sek pf John W. Nichols Clerk of the Panel ] HEREBY CERTIFY that the above ard foregoing is a true and correct □□□□ of the origi ile in my office Ss □□□□□ DISTRICP OF NEW J WiLLIAYA T. W, NEE IN RE: JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2738 SCHEDULE CTO-193 — TAG-ALONG ACTIONS DIST DIV, C.A.NO, CASE CAPTION CALIFORNIA CENTRAL CAC 5 19-02425 Hansi E. Tietge et al v. Johnson and Johnson et al CALIFORNIA EASTERN CAE 2 19—02520 Gaskins v. Johnson & Johnson et al CALIFORNIA NORTHERN CAN 3 19-08193 Charles E. Brandner v. Johnson & Johnson et al CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN CAS 3 19-02409 Bailey v. Johnson & Johnson et al MASSACHUSETTS MA 1 20—10008 Bonta v. Johnson & Johnson et al NEW YORK EASTERN NYE 2 19-07117 Zaleski v. Johnson & Johnson et. al. NYE 2 20—00086 Gallagher et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al NEW YORK NORTHERN NYN 5 19-01540 Pattit v. Johnson & Johnson, et al. ~ 4 7