(PC) Burton v. Uddin

[7] 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA [10] 11 KENDALL BURTON, No. 2:19-cv-1616 JAM CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 MESKATH UDDIN, et al., 15 Defendants. [16] 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to [19] 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On January 5, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the findings and 25 recommendations was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to 26 keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service 27 of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. 28 ///// 1 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 2 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 3 See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452 , 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having 4 reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record 5 and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 6 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 7 1. The findings and recommendations filed January 5, 2021, are adopted in full; 8 2. Defendant Uddin’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 50) is granted; and 9 3. This case is closed. [11] Dated: February 11, 2022 /s/ John A. Mendez [12] THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE