(PS) Chiu v. Trump

[5] 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA [8] 9 TAIFUSIN CHIU, Case No. 2:23-cv-02626-TLN-JDP 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER 12 DONALD TRUMP, et al., 13 Defendants. [16] 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a 18 United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On December 12, 2023, the 19 magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff, and 20 which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed 21 within fourteen days. No objections were filed. 22 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 23 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 24 See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the 25 magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court …”). 26 Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be 27 supported by the record and by the proper analysis. [28] 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations, filed December 12, 2023 (ECF No. 5), are 3 ADOPTED IN FULL; 4 2. Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED without leave to amend; and 5 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 6 | Date: April 19, 2024 /) a | look 10 Troy L. Nunley ] United States District Judge