Manrique v. O'Keefe

— 1 — — 2 — — 3 — — 4 — — 5 — — 6 — — 7 — 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 San Francisco Division 11 ALEJANDRO TOLEDO MANRIQUE, Case No. 21-cv-08395-LB 12 Petitioner, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 13 v. Re: ECF No. 1 14 DONALD O’KEEFE, United States Marshal for the Northern District of California, — 15 — Respondent. — 16 — 17 INTRODUCTION 18 Petitioner Alejandro Toledo Manrique — the former President of Peru — filed this habeas 19 petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 challenging a certification of his extraditability to Peru, where he 20 is accused of collusion and money laundering. (Pet. – ECF No. 1.) This order requires the 21 respondent to respond to the petition. 22 ANALYSIS 23 “An extradition may be challenged by way of a petition for writ of habeas corpus in federal 24 court.” Gonzalez v. O’Keefe, No. C 12-2681 LHK, 2014 WL 6065880 , at *1 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 20, 25 2014). (citing Roberts v. Reilly, 116 U.S. 80 (1885) & Prasoprat v. Benov, 421 F.3d 1009, 1013 (9th 26 Cir. 2005)). A district court must “award the writ or issue an order directing the respondent to show 27 cause why the writ should not be granted, unless it appears from the application that the applicant or ] person is not entitled thereto.” 28 U.S.C. § 2243 . The respondent must respond the petition on the 2 || schedule set forth below. 3 CONCLUSION 4 The clerk must serve a copy of this order and the “consent or declination to magistrate judge 5 || jurisdiction” form on the respondent by email to (1) usacan.ecf.usdoj.gov, (2) 6 || michelle.lo@usdoj.gov, (3) kathy.terry@usdoj.gov, (4) kyle.waldinger@usdoj.gov, and (5) 7 || rebecca.haciski@usdoj.gov. (The first three addresses are the usual email protocol for 28 U.S.C. § 8 || 2241 petitions, and the court adds the last two because they are counsel of record in the extradition 9 || proceedings.) The respondent’s return is due November 18, 2021. The petitioner’s traverse is due 10 || December 16, 2021. The parties may confer about and adjust the schedule by stipulation. 1] The matter will be taken under submission, or set for hearing, in the court’s discretion. IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 Dated: November 1, 2021 LAE eo LAUREL BEELER nited States Magistrate Judge — 16 — Z 18 — 19 — — 20 — — 21 — — 22 — — 23 — — 24 — — 25 — — 26 — — 27 — — 28 —