Hammond v. Gastelo

— 1 — — 2 — — 3 — — 4 — — 5 — — 6 — — 7 — 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA — 10 — 11 RICHARD GIDEON HAMMOND, Case No.: 3:20-cv-00261-BAS-DEB 12 Petitioner, ORDER REQUESTING 13 v. SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING 14 JOSIE GASTELO, et al., 15 Respondents. — 16 — 17 Petitioner Richard Gideon Hammond, proceeding pro se, filed a Petition for a Writ 18 of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging his February 21, 2018 19 conviction and sentence in San Diego Superior Court (Case No. SCS280604). Dkt. No. 1. 20 Petitioner’s second ground for relief claims “the trial court relied on improper factors in 21 imposing the upper [sentencing] term.” Dkt. No. 1 at 7. Upon review of the petition papers, 22 the Court has identified an issue that requires additional briefing. 23 On April 14, 2020, Petitioner filed a Notice of Change of Address and subsequently 24 informed the Court of his March 8, 2020 release from California Men’s Colony – West. 25 See Dkt. Nos. 6, 10 at 3. In light of Petitioner’s release, the Court directs the parties to 26 address whether Petitioner’s second ground for relief, challenging the length of his 27 sentence, is moot. See Caswell v. Calderon, 363 F.3d 832, 836 (9th Cir. 2004) (“A 28 challenge to a prison sentence becomes moot once the sentence has been served unless the 1 || petitioner continues to suffer collateral consequences.”) (citing United States v. Palomba, 2 || 182 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th Cir. 1999)). 3 The Court requests the parties provide supplemental briefing on this issue. 4 ||Respondent must file its supplemental brief on or before July 15, 2020. Petitioner must file 5 || any response on or before July 31, 2020. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. — 7 — 8 ||Dated: June 30, 2020 — PTT 10 Honorable Daniel E. Butcher United States Magistrate Judge — 11 — — 12 — — 13 — — 14 — — 15 — — 16 — — 17 — — 18 — — 19 — — 20 — — 21 — — 22 — — 23 — — 24 — — 25 — — 26 — — 27 — — 28 —