Minneapolis, St. Paul, & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad Company, in Error v. Louise Alexander, Administratrix, Etc

239 U.S. 635 36 S.Ct. 283 60 L.Ed. 479 MINNEAPOLIS, ST. PAUL, & SAULT STE. MARIE RAILROAD COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. LOUISE ALEXANDER, Administratrix, etc. No. 148. Supreme Court of the United States January 10, 1916 Mr. William A. Hayes for plaintiff in error. Mr. D. W. McNamara and Miss Anna B. Hull for defendant in error. Per Curiam: [1] Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Consolidated Turnp. Co. v. Norfolk & O. V. R. Co. 228 U. S. 596, 600, 57 L. ed. 982, 983, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 609; Manhattan L. Ins. Co. v. Cohen, 234 U. S. 123, 137, 58 L. ed. 1245, 1254, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 874; Easterling Lumber Co. v. Pierce, 235 U. S. 380, 59 L. ed. 279, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 133; (2) Missouri P. R. Co. v. Humes, 115 U. S. 512, 29 L. ed. 463, 6 Sup. Ct. Rep. 110; Minneapolis & St. L. R. Co. v. Beckwith, 129 U. S. 26, 32 L. ed. 585, 9 Sup. Ct. Rep. 207; Minneapolis & St. L. R. Co. v. Emmons, 149 U. S. 364, 37 L. ed. 769, 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 870; (3) Waters-Pierce Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas, 212 U. S. 112, 118, 53 L. ed. 431, 434, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 227; Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co. 226 U. S. 102, 57 L. ed. 140, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 80; Overton v. Oklahoma, 235 U. S. 31, 59 L. ed. 112, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 14.