Full text
Yates v. Little Six Corp
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-1293
VERNON AVERY YATES,
Petitioner,
versus
LITTLE SIX CORPORATION; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (94-2343-BLA)
Submitted: June 30, 1997 Decided: November 4, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vernon Avery Yates, Petitioner Pro Se. Ramesh Murthy, PENN, STUART & ESKRIDGE, Abingdon, Virginia; Christian P. Barber, Helen Hart Cox, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 1997). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision
is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Yates v. Little Six Corp., No. 94-2343-BLA (Jan. 26, 1995). We deny the em-
ployer's motion to strike the Director's brief, but nonetheless decline to consider issues not raised before the Board. See Big Horn
Coal Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, Dep't of Labor, 897 F.2d 1052, 1054 (10th Cir. 1990); see also
Pleasant Valley Hosp., Inc. v. Shalala, 32 F.3d 67, 70 (4th Cir. 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.