Full text
Hopson v. GPM Investments, LLC
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
AT GREENEVILLE
TIMOTHY HOPSON, SR., )
) Case No. 2:23-cv-105 Plaintiff, ) ) Judge Travis R. McDonough v. ) ) Magistrate Judge Cynthia R. Wyrick
GPM INVESTMENTS, LLC, )
) Defendant. ) ) )
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Cynthia R. Wyrick’s report and recommendation (Doc. 5), which recommends that the Court dismiss Plaintiff Timothy Hopson, Sr.’s amended complaint without prejudice. Plaintiff filed the original complaint (Doc. 1) in this action on August 23, 2023, and contemporaneously filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2). Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, district courts must screen pro se complaints—even when the plaintiff is not a prisoner but seeks in forma pauperis status—and sua sponte dismiss any claims that are frivolous or malicious, fail to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or name a defendant who is immune. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (e)(2); Baker v. Wayne Cnty. Fam. Indep. Agency, 75 F. App’x 501, 502 (6th Cir. 2003) (“The statute requires courts to dismiss in forma pauperis complaints that fail to state a claim[] and applies to complaints filed by non-prisoners as well as prisoners.” (citations omitted)). Therefore, Magistrate Judge Wyrick screened Plaintiff’s complaint in addition to considering his motion to proceed in forma pauperis. On screening, Magistrate Judge Wyrick found that Plaintiff had not alleged sufficient facts to invoke this Court’s subject-matter jurisdiction. (Doc. 5, at 5.) Specifically, Plaintiff did not allege facts from which the Court could determine Defendant’s citizenship for purposes of diversity jurisdiction. (Id.) Magistrate Judge Wyrick noted that this is Plaintiff’s second suit against Defendant, the first of which was also dismissed for failure to adequately allege facts
which would support diversity jurisdiction. (Id. at 4.) Plaintiff has filed no objections to Magistrate Judge Wyrick’s report and recommendation and the time to do so has now passed. After reviewing the record, the Court agrees with Magistrate Judge Wyrick’s report and recommendation. The Court hereby ACCEPTS and ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Wyrick’s report and recommendation (Doc. 5). This action SHALL be DISMISSED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE.
AN APPROPRIATE JUDGMENT WILL ENTER.
/s/ Travis R. McDonough
TRAVIS R. MCDONOUGH
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
