Oka Nashoba Chikashah Nation v. Jenkins

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION ______________________________________________________________________________ OKA NASHOBA CHIKASHA NATION on ) behalf of its members ANDRE MATTHEWS ) also known as CHIEF NOWANAKI YANASH,) KYLE WATKINS also known as CHIEF ) EAGLE EYE, KATRINA GREEN-WATKINS ) and COOSA NATION OF NORTH AMERICA ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) No. 22-cv-2448-MSN-cgc ) JOEDAE L. JENKINS, REGINA MORRISON ) NEWMAN, GREGORY S. GALLAGHER ) JAMES A. CRISLIP, JR., SHELBY COUNTY ) CHANCERY COURT, SHELBY COUNTY ) TRUSTEE, WOODS PROJECT LLC, ) GOVERNOR BILL LEE and STATE OF ) TENNESSEE (all in official and independent ) capacity), ) ) Defendants. ) ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO FILE A PROPERLY COMPLETED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AFFIDAVIT OR PAY THE CIVIL FILING FEE ______________________________________________________________________________ Before the Court, by way of Administrative Order 2013-05,1 is the July 8, 2022 pro se complaint filed in the above captioned case, along with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1 & 2.) Federal law provides that the clerk of each district court shall require parties instituting 1 The instant case has been referred to the United States Magistrate Judge by Administrative Order pursuant to the Federal Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 631-639 . All pretrial matters within the Magistrate Judge’s jurisdiction are referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(A) for determination, and all other pretrial matters are referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B)-(C) for report and recommendation any such civil action, suit or proceeding in such court, whether by original process, removal or otherwise, to pay a filing fee of $402.2 28 U.S.C. § 1914 (a) To ensure access to the courts, however, 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (a) permits an indigent plaintiff to avoid payment of filing fees by filing an in forma pauperis affidavit. Under that section, the Court must conduct a satisfactory inquiry into the plaintiff’s ability to pay the filing fee and prosecute the lawsuit. A plaintiff seeking in forma pauperis standing must respond fully to the questions on the Court’s in forma pauperis form and execute the affidavit in compliance with the certification requirements contained in 28 U.S.C. § 1746 . See, e.q., Reynolds v. Federal Bur. of Prisons, 30 F. App’x 574 (6th Cir. 2002); Broque v. Fort Knox Fed. Credit Union, No. 86-1896, 1997 WL 242032 (6th cir. May 8, 1997). In this case, there are five plaintiffs listed, two of which appear to be entities. Only one affidavit was filed with no indication as to which of the three individual plaintiffs the information is applicable. Therefore, the affidavit does not provide the Court with sufficient financial information to determine which, if any, of the individual plaintiffs is unable to pay the civil filing fee. Therefore, the individual plaintiffs – Andre Mathews, Kyle Watkins and Katrina Green-Watkins - are each ORDERED to either submit a properly completed non prisoner application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the $402 civil filing fee within thirty (30) days of the date of this order. The Clerk shall send the plaintiffs copies of the Court’s non-prisoner application to proceed in forma pauperis along with this order. The entities listed as plaintiffs – Oka Nashoba Chikashah Nation and Coosa Nation of 2Twenty-eight U.S.C. § 1914(a) requires a civil filing fee of $350. However, pursuant to § 1914(b), “[t]he clerk shall collect from the parties such additional fees only as are prescribed by the Judicial Conference of the United States.” The Judicial Conference has prescribed, effective May 1, 2013, an additional administrative fee of $52 for filing any civil case, except for cases in which the plaintiff is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 . North America – must be represented by licensed counsel. An individual may represent himself before the court but may not represent another person or entity unless they are duly licensed and authorized to practice before the court. See, 28 U.S.C. § 1654 and Davis v. Memphis Police Dept., No. 2:13–cv–02497–JDT–dkv, 2013 WL 4446240 , at*5 (W.D.Tenn. Aug. 15.2013). A plaintiff may not appear pro se where “interests other than his own are at stake.” Shepherd v. Wellman, 313 F.3d 963, 970 (6th Cir.2002). Only a licensed attorney may represent other persons. Davis, 2013 WL 4446240 at *5 (citing cases). If an appearance by counsel on behalf of these entities is not made within thirty (30) days of entry of this order, a recommendation will be made that any claims on behalf of these entities be dismissed. Failure to comply with this order in a timely manner will result in the entry of a report and recommendation to the District Court recommending dismissal of the action for failure to prosecute, without further notice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). IT IS SO ORDERED, this 27th day of October, 2022. s/ Charmiane G. Claxton CHARMIANE G. CLAXTON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE