Mathis v. Experian Information Solutions

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUBBOCK DIVISION KEVIN MATHIS, Plaintiff, V. No. 5:20-CV-274-H-BOQ EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, Defendant. ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE United States Magistrate D. Gordon Bryant made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation (FCR) in this case on May 21, 2021. See Dkt. No. 9. Judge Bryant recommended that the Court dismiss the case without prejudice for want of prosecution pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Jd. No objections to the FCR were filed. The District Court has therefore reviewed the proposed FCR for plain error. U.S. ex rel. Steury v. Cardinal Health, Inc., 735 F.3d 202, 205 (Sth Cir. 2013) (“[P]lain error review applies when a party did not object to a magistrate judge’s findings of fact, conclusions of law, or recommendation to the district court, so long as the party was served with notice of the consequences of failing to object.”) (citing Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1428 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc), superseded on other grounds by 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)). Finding no error, plain or otherwise, the Court accepts the FCR of the United States Magistrate Judge. The plaintiffs claims against the defendant are dismissed without prejudice. The Court will enter a judgment in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58 in a separate document. So ordered on June 14. 202 Ac (O/he ee UNJTED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE