Miliskiewicz v Meenan ( 2025 NY Slip Op 50034(U) )
[*1] <table align="center"> <tbody><tr> <td align="center"><b>Miliskiewicz v Meenan</b></td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center"> 2025 NY Slip Op 50034(U) [ 84 Misc 3d 133(A) ]</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center">Decided on January 16, 2025</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center">Appellate Term, First Department</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center">Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center">This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.</td></tr> </tbody></table> <br><br>
Decided on January 16, 2025 <br><div></div>SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST
DEPARTMENT
<br>PRESENT: Hagler, P.J., Brigantti, Tisch, JJ.
<br>570237/24
<br><br><div><b>Zofia Miliskiewicz, Plaintiff-Appellant, <br><br>against<br><br>Collen Meenan, Defendant-Respondent.</b></div><br><br>
<p>Plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Dana M. Catanzaro, J.), entered April 11, 2024, which denied her motion to restore the action to the calendar.</p>
<p><strong>Per Curiam.</strong></p> <p>Order (Dana M. Catanzaro, J.), entered April 11, 2024, affirmed, without costs.</p> <p>Plaintiff's motion to restore the action to the calendar was properly denied, since the action was previously dismissed as time-barred, pursuant to an order of the Civil Court, dated December 5, 2022, from which plaintiff took no appeal (<i>see Yeger v E*Trade Sec. LLC</i>, 52 AD3d 441 [2008]). Nor has plaintiff established any grounds for vacating the December 2022 order (<i>see</i> CPLR 5015).</p> <p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p> I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: January 16, 2025
<br><br><div>
</div>
Loading…