Full text
In Re Petition of CSX Transportation, Inc., to Close to Vehicular Traffic the County Road 205/Ulsh Road Grade Crossing (262—061N), Located in Claridon Township, Marion County, Ohio
Opinions in this case
- Opinion — Per curiam
- Majority
- Concurrence — Pfeifer
[Cite as In re Petition of CSX Transp., Inc., 124 Ohio St.3d 1235, 2010-Ohio-1316.]
IN RE PETITION OF CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., TO CLOSE TO VEHICULAR TRAFFIC THE COUNTY ROAD 205/ULSH ROAD GRADE CROSSING (262-061N), LOCATED IN CLARIDON TOWNSHIP, MARION COUNTY, OHIO. [Cite as In re Petition of CSX Transp., Inc., 124 Ohio St.3d 1235, 2010-Ohio-1316.] (No. 2010-0127 — Submitted March 24, 2010 — Decided April 1, 2010.) APPEAL from the Public Utilities Commission, No. 09-125-RR-UNC. ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS __________________ {¶ 1} This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio. Appellee and intervening appellee have filed motions to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, asserting that appellant failed to perfect its appeal. {¶ 2} The motions to dismiss are granted. Accordingly, this cause is dismissed. MOYER, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur. PFEIFER, J., concurs separately. __________________ PFEIFER, J., concurring. {¶ 3} I concur in the decision to dismiss the appeal but write separately to emphasize that dual filing requirements should be abolished. A. Schulman, Inc. v. Wilkins, 112 Ohio St.3d 1208, 2006-Ohio-6677, 859 N.E.2d 553, ¶ 6 (Pfeifer, J., dissenting). They serve no useful purpose. Olympic Steel, Inc. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision, 110 Ohio St.3d 1242, 2006-Ohio-4091, 852 N.E.2d 178 (Pfeifer, J., dissenting). Dual filing requirements are a trap for attorneys operating
— 2 —
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
outside their normal area of practice. Prosecuting attorneys are not normally expert in the procedures associated with public utility law. In this case, that lack of experience led to the prosecuting attorney’s failing to deliver a notice of appeal to the Public Utility Commission of Ohio’s docketing division and, ultimately, to a dismissal other than on the merits. In other circumstances, I might have cast a dissenting vote, but in this case, the prosecuting attorney had an opportunity to cure the filing defect but did not avail himself of it. __________________ Brent W. Yager, Marion County Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant, Claridon Township Board of Trustees. Richard Cordray, Attorney General, and Duane W. Luckey and William L. Wright, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio. Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur, L.L.P., R. Leland Evans, and Megan E. Bailey, for intervening appellee, CSX Transportation, Inc. ______________________
