Loading…

Schum v. Burchard — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Schum v. Burchard

240 N.Y. 577 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 3, 1925

Full text

Charles H. Schum Et Al., Appellants, v. Florence L. Burchard, Respondent

Judgment affirmed; with costs; no opinion. Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Crane and Lehman, JJ. Dissenting: Pound, McLaughlin and Andrews, JJ.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 3630921

Citations

240 N.Y. 577
1925 N.Y. LEXIS 800
148 N.E. 712

Cited by

Weinstein v. Weinstein
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Jan 23, 2007
Abrams v. Nat Lewis Purses, Inc.
New York Supreme Court · Oct 13, 1939
Schum v. Burchard
New York Court of Appeals · May 12, 1925

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service