Loading…

Schum v. Burchard — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Schum v. Burchard

240 N.Y. 643 · New York Court of Appeals · May 12, 1925

Full text

Charles H. Schum Et Al., Appellants, v. Florence L. Burchard, Respondent

Motion for re-argument denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. (See 240 N. Y. 577.)

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 3634222

Citations

240 N.Y. 643
1925 N.Y. LEXIS 875
148 N.E. 740

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service