PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on the authority of Pope v. State, 542 So.2d 423 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989), rev. granted, 550 So.2d 467 (Fla.1989).
AFFIRMED.
DAUKSCH, COBB and PETERSON, JJ., concur.
Loading…
Loading…
Opinion
1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2647 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Apr 19, 1990
District Court of Appeal of Florida · Dec 11, 1990
District Court of Appeal of Florida · Apr 19, 1990
Parentheticals
observing that the principle that the law in effect at the time of appeal should be applied extends to the pendency of motions for rehearing before issuance of the mandate
noting “[t]he appellate process is not completed until a mandate is issued.”
“A ‘pipeline case’ is one in which a conviction is not final by trial or appeal at the time a controlling decision is issued by the supreme court. The appellate process is not completed until a mandate is issued.” (citation omitted)
finding no authority to delay application of Pope