Opinion

Knight v. Waters

2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8770 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jun 26, 2001

Full text

Marshall KNIGHT v. Beth S. WATERS

PER CURIAM. We affirm the appealed order because the appellant’s section 784.046(7)(e), Florida Statutes, motion to modify or dissolve the injunction in this case did not assert changed circumstances which would warrant relief. This does not preclude the appellant from filing a motion asserting such changed circumstances, and seeking a hearing thereon. ALLEN, WOLF and WEBSTER, JJ., CONCUR.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Allen, Webster, Wolf
Cluster ID: 7800690

Citations

2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8770
786 So. 2d 1289
2001 WL 708735

Cited by

McKinnon v. Pelt
District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jan 15, 2016
Thaddeus M. McKinnon v. Michelle Lee Pelt (McKinnon)
District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jan 14, 2016
Reyes v. Reyes
District Court of Appeal of Florida · Dec 14, 2012
Alkhoury v. Alkhoury
District Court of Appeal of Florida · Mar 2, 2011
Colarusso v. Lupetin
District Court of Appeal of Florida · Mar 3, 2010

Parentheticals

affirming order denying a motion to modify or dissolve a protective injunction under section 784.046 because the motion did not assert a change in circumstances
Colarusso v. Lupetin
affirming order denying a motion to modify or dissolve a protective injunction under section 784.046 because the motion did not assert a change in circumstances
Reyes v. Reyes