
Loading…

Loading…
Opinion
507 U.S. 921 · Supreme Court of the United States · Feb 22, 1993
Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso) · Dec 8, 2010
Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth) · Nov 18, 2010
Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 8, 2010
Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo) · Apr 1, 2009
Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo) · Aug 7, 2008
Supreme Court of Connecticut · Apr 22, 2008
Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 15, 2007
Parentheticals
stating “[i]t is well settled that, in determining the sufficiency of an affidavit for an arrest or search warrant, a reviewing court is limited to the ‘four corners of an affidavit’ ”
stating "[i]t is well settled that, in determining the sufficiency of an affidavit for an arrest or search warrant, a reviewing court is limited to the 'four corners of an affidavit'"
stating “[i]t is well settled that, in determining the sufficiency of an affidavit for an arrest or search warrant, a reviewing court is limited to the ‘four corners of an affidavit’”
trial court's evidentiary ruling should not be disturbed on appeal if correct on any theory of "law applicable to the case"
trial court’s evi-dentiary ruling should not be disturbed on appeal if correct on any theory of "law applicable to the case”